Lawyers for Elon Musk and OpenAI delivered their closing arguments this week, leaving it to jurors to determine whether OpenAI acted improperly during its controversial transformation into a more profit-oriented entity. The trial, which has drawn significant attention from the tech industry and legal observers alike, centers on allegations that OpenAI deviated from its original nonprofit mission. Jurors must now weigh the evidence presented over what has been an extensive legal proceeding to reach a verdict. The proceedings have increasingly focused on the character and credibility of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. Musk's attorney Steve Molo specifically pressed Altman during questioning about statements he made during congressional testimony, suggesting potential inconsistencies in his public accounts. This line of questioning highlights how the trial has evolved beyond technical or business disputes into a deeper examination of executive trustworthiness—a theme that dominated much of the closing arguments. On the latest episode of TechCrunch's Equity podcast, hosts Anthony Ha, Kirsten Korosec, and Sean O'Kane discussed how the trial exposed fundamental questions about trust in the AI industry. The conversation turned directly to whether Altman himself is trustworthy, with the podcast hosts engaging in a candid exchange about the difficulty of answering that question definitively. The hosts noted that numerous former OpenAI employees and colleagues have expressed doubts about Altman's reliability and transparency over the years. Korosec observed that Musk himself has made misleading statements, pointing out that the trust issue extends beyond just Altman. She emphasized that this represents a broader challenge for the entire AI industry, noting that policymakers, journalists, and consumers increasingly struggle to evaluate AI labs given their private status and limited public accountability. As these companies continue to develop transformative—and potentially consequential—technology, the fundamental question of who can be trusted to lead them remains largely unanswered.